actually she hit the less than informed repubs between the eyes.....they were head hunting and ended up with their own heads in their laps....with their tongues handing out. We will remember. See you Johnson...one termer.

So mike, what did she answer that told us or the families of the dead what really happened, Why did she not explain the attack instead of someone who Obama even said knew nothing of the attack.

Why did she say there was no real time video on it, when we now know there was a US drone in the air on part of the attack and they were able to identify one indidvidual from video of the attack? Why was security so small at the compound with no backup in place? Why were the Ambassadors calls for more security, ignored? Why was security not increased for 9/11, when we know the terrorist allways use aniversary dates to do another attck on american interest? Why were the FBI denied questioning the man Identfied on video after he was caught in Tunisia and has no been released? Why weeks after there were still people including Obama still saying the so called video was the catylast for the attack? Why was no-one held responsible for negligence if that was part of the problem? She was the boss at the time after all?

I could go on with a ton more questions that matter. Why did she not just give a timeline to answer all of these things? They are common questions, that the people should know.

Your post makes no sense and is disrespectfull to those that died. This is not some video game, and deflection by you of the politicians and who won at a hearing is strange to say the least. It is about the Government answering questions by our representatives of the people.

crocodile tears

...Sec. of State Clinton did an outstanding job as our Ambassador in Chief throughout the world....
No arguing there...she has the highest body count.

Try bush's 200 thousand in Iraq

Secretary of State Bush had 200 thousand state department employees killed.. in Iraq?? holy crap..I was so off base. Thanks for being on the same sheet of music, Mike..now, off to make my bologna and whipped cream sandwich.

Hey leave.....sounds yummy.....people are people wherever you are. Since a number of the poor victims at Bengazi were contractor....that certainly falls into Iraq and its' numbers....no not 200k but many hundreds of 'civilian' contractors were 'lost' during the Bagdad ballet. Ms. Clinton did take responsibility for the debacle in Bengazi...when did I hear the same from herr Bush or Cheney?

"..Sec. of State Clinton did an outstanding job as our Ambassador in Chief throughout the world.
She was accepted by all countries and represented us professionally. "
MIke..thanks for getting the bologna and whipped cream analogy for "it doesn't go together"
My post was in response to the above subject matter and statement. C'mon man I thought you might be beyond trying to serve me a red herring sandwich. I've now punched your "give him credit" card. There is no OIF,OEF, Desert Storm/Shield/Just Cause or CINC mention at all...and if I tell my mother you were bad in the playground..well then mister...she will put a hand on her hip and tell me not to hang with you.

Mike maybe you were going here. If so I'll take it all under consideration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzGnX-MbYE4

LOL

Why is it that anyone who disagrees with Hillary Clinton is labeled a misogynist (I am a woman so I guess that makes me a woman hating woman) and anyone who disagrees with Obama is a racist and if you are a black female who disagrees with them you are a whore? I guess that is how you have to operate in the world of alternate reality where truth doesn't matter and in this alternate reality Hillary has done a superb job. Just go ask the Kardashians, they think so too.

@pam
I agree pam but I think it's the forum here and rules of the playground. It's fairly amusing when alternate opinions are attached to a funny accusation. I try to picture them with their hand on a hip and stomping a foot with nothing to return but the "I know you are but what am I"..sometimes it will make you umm..OMG..LOL..unlike the Kartrashians whom I was extremely displeased of their SAG Awards snub.\

Just remember....the new 45 is 65 years......Obama is just a kid

So Joe, are you saying that "W" lied about WMD's which was the pretext for starting two wars that killed or wounded thousands of American men and women and added trillions to our national debt?

JAT: Whether "W" lied or not has no bearing on the military action in Afghanistan. That was entirely a result of 9/11 and the need to "get" Bin Laden. If accumulating the $850 billion. The trillions which were added to our debt were a result of bank and auto manufacture bailouts and make-work stimulus and defaulted loans to "green" companies and other various sundries.

False information. What would you do?

Go back and re-read what I posted. I was correcting your false point that 2 wars were started over WMDs. They were not. Most in this country were in full support of the military action in Afghanistan. I was litterally shouted down when I suggested that I would rather see a formal declaration of war than an open ended authorization of the use of force to "defeat terror." Another point you made which I was correcting is that The military action in Iraq didn't cost trillions. Even if the WMDs were a full on, outright lie, that would mean 1 war based on a lie cost us billions. Now, if you want to discuss WMDs, intelligence reports were severely lacking. In addition, there was no proof to show that Sadaam's chemical and biological stockpiles were ever destroyed. As such, it was a perfectly reasonable thing for the President to drum up support using what he had to achieve his agenda. Congress accepted the intelligence, which would suggest they also believed the intelligence reports. I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt to the President and Congress that the reports of WMDs were at least plausible. You may have other standards though.

Yep...did nothing.....kept the lid on....so you are successful SOS if you manage conflict that your boss involves us in? The iceberg you talk about is the obstruction that keeps the real Americans from working intelligently.

Managing conflicts is our people killed? Wow.

Managing conflicts is thousands dead across the Middle East and North Africa? Wow.

Managing conflicts is attacking Libya without Congressional approvel required by Law. (see War Powers Act).

Managing conflict is disappears thousands of rockets in Libya suddenly turning up all over the Middle East.

Managing conflicts is, nothing accomplished on Iran?

Managing Conficts is The treaty between Egypt and Isreal being threated with cancellation by Egypt?

Managing conflicts is supporting the so called Arab Spring that failed but not the one that was crushed in Iran?

Come on she and this Administration have accomplished nothing but fan the flame of war in the Middle East to a point we have not seen since the 70's.

Any average person can see that I would think, why can't you? Wow again.

your idea of management is akin to unilateral conflict instigated by good ole' USA.....I regret that you see our involvement in the Arab spring as our idea and our theater.....Is it not the idea to minimalize our exposure and have our allies shoulder the weight in our best interests? Smart swagger beats bully swagger anyday.

Wow mike, did you write Hillary's answers?

No where did I say I supported involvement in the wacked out Arab Spring. I merely State that Our SOS had involvement in them all except for the Iran one. She along with the rest of the Administration touted all this as a March to freedom and Democracy in all those Country's.

At least you admit they instigated it, which turned into a total failure they as usual will never admit. You probably support giving Egypt the F-16's from a deal in 2010 that never has to be done with a different government that is already talking about starting wars and naturally like the rest put Sharia law in place. Yep real democracy you support there Mike.

If you think any of the Islamic Country's are allies to the US you are dreaming. They change allegience at the drop of a hat, cartoon, Video, terrorist attacks on Americans any where in the world and you call them allies? lol

You had to be involved in writing Hillary's answers. Just saying

We still wait in anticipation Mike on just who the "Real Americans" are as NK suggested.

you betcha

as if you had a pipeline to the state department and the cia. You just do not like her

oh yes....most people fear and distrust the people that are smarter than they are.

clarify what you mean....where did she lie relative to the bengazi debacle? At least you guys read and respond.

Corporate American Flag? Just what is that Mike?

Ah--the evil corporations consisting of people that actually make and build the things that you use and wear? Study history before you buy in to the socialist utopia model Mike. It's a great deal for the elites at the top--but you won't be one of those few...

The red white and blue of Exxon and Walmart

Gee Mike, I hope you do not have a Pension Plan at work, 401K, Drive any thing with a combustion engine, or tools ie, Weed wackers, Lawn mowers etc. Or are friends with any of the 2.5 million workers employed by walmart. Guess you are a unique individual who does not own any products at all or a house or eat food, all of which has items that are made by Corporation and conglomorates. That would make you under, the "Corporate American Flag" would it not? lol

Okay, so I read it...

From the recommended hatchet piece,
"Meanwhile, the Democrats, almost uniformly, seemed interested in celebrating
Mrs. Clinton as a global diva who somehow manages to carry the burden of her awesomeness with humility and grace. If smoking were still allowed in the Capitol, one could easily imagine her removing a cigarette from a gold case and tapping it nonchalantly on the witness table, and the entire Democratic caucus leaping over their desks for the chance to light it for her."

- Jonah Goldberg

Way to cite something "Fair and Balanced" Pam.

Oh...I just love those opined articles that start with the premise of Ms. Clinton being the devil incarnate. I also love watching the righties on this blog struggling with their identity....to libertarian or to be corporate. Confusion seems to be your group's main idea. The only focus you have is a collective irrational hatred for Ms. Clinton.

She's not a viable candidate, if Barack Obama could push past her.

Look to the rising Latino population to produce the first viable Female candidate.
Americans don't vote for female WASPs or Asians.

For the most part, we're still choosing the tallest candidate.

It's recasting of the Neanderthal leadership method - Who's the biggest ape
standing at the mouth of the cave to defend the Tribe? (He's not wearing heels.)

Oh good. Michelle O is taller than Hills.

Pretty good scam the whitehouse has..my guess is it's really Rue Paul in that red dress.